Celebrity Poker Tournaments
It is a truism that today’s mainstream culture is extremely obsessed with celebrities. Gossip-mongers like the infamous Perez Hilton make their living from spreading and corroborating rumors about the (supposedly) famous and glamorous. Thus, it is not at all a surprise that poker tournaments are dominated by celebrities would make quite a big splash. However, exactly what kind of splash this would be is rather open to question. How do celebrity poker tournaments affect the image and popularity of poker in general?
It is quite possible that many of the people who have recently gotten in to poker did so partly because they saw one of their favorite celebrities playing it on TV. Can such players ever be taken seriously? Undoubtedly, at least some of them will decide not to stick with their new hobby, while others will take to it like a proverbial duck to water.
We may also as well bring up the issue of the “caliber” of the particular celebrities associated with televised poker tournaments. For example, a game featuring Brad Pitt (if only!) would be quite different from one featuring Wendy Pepper, the woman who became the designated villain of one of the seasons of Project Runway. Is poker a game for A-listers or for former, widely pilloried reality show contestants? The answer to this question can be reasonably argued to have implications for poker’s image in popular culture. Of course, it is quite possible for the same tournaments to include a wide range of celebrities. This may result in a confusing public image for poker, one with a rather ambiguous hipness factor.
We can also discuss the attitude to money displayed in matches dominated by Hollywood’s royalty, or at least its minor peerage. On the one hand, these people are amateur players. They do not make their living from FullTiltPoker.com. On the other hand, they probably have much more money to spend than most amateur players do, and can afford to risk and lose higher amounts more casually. Thus, an amateur watching a celebrity poker match may come to have a distorted view of the way money should be approached and used in poker. To the amateur, money is a scarce and volatile resource, while to the professional, it is a tool. To many celebrity players, it is neither, and people who become “students” of such players might not know the appropriate way to use their funds.
Many owners of poker sites are probably quite grateful for the free, indirect publicity offered by celebrity poker tournaments. The resulting glitz-fueled poker boom may be the temporary (and fading already, according to some sources), but it much better than no boom at all. However, for their own sakes, the people who gained from this boom should not get too used to their currently rosy situation. For example, owners of prosperous poker sites may start to lose their customers. Professional poker sharks such as Phil Ivey may find that that poker halls and tournaments suddenly contain fewer rookies to prey upon. In other words, the best attitude toward a trend is one of flexibility and non-attachment. Riding a trend can be a great move, but one should also be able to let go of said trend once it fades.